China’s latest PMI data, released earlier this week, showed manufacturing growth in September slowing to its lowest level in more than two years. An export sub-gauge fell deeper into contraction territory, suggesting that exporters face a worsening outlook over the coming months as the US ramps up tariffs next year. A statement by the Politburo after a meeting on Wednesday signalled that further stimulus measures are being planned as downward growth pressure continues to build. The government has to take “timely” steps to counter this development, the statement noted. At the same time, the State Council released detailed guidance on boosting infrastructure investment, highlighting key projects and designating specific ministries to ensure efficient policy implementation.
This is in line with our judgment in July that the authorities are stepping up efforts to stabilize growth, whereby fiscal policy is leading the way. But in our view, it is crucial to put the on-going stimulus in China into perspective rather than getting over-excited about it while ignoring the details. After the 2008 mega-stimulus programme, China went through another two easing cycles, in 2012-13 and 2015-16, with policies that provided strong support for the global economy. While emerging markets may be sailing into a “perfect storm” scenario in 2019 amid tightening global dollar liquidity, trade-war escalation and higher oil prices, many investors are now looking to China once again to provide the circuit breaker that prevents contagion.
We think the strong investor expectation that Beijing will simply rely on old-style credit easing and fiscal measures to prop up the economy and that this will prove positive once again for other markets is misplaced. Here are the reasons why:
The overall positive spill-over effect from China’s domestic credit easing and fiscal stimulus is thus likely to prove more limited than was the case in the past, partly because Chinese authorities will, we believe, choose to allow further passive yuan devaluation as part of their response to the trade war and the growth slowdown. While stronger domestic demand will be positive for countries that export to China, those emerging markets that compete with the PRC and tend to produce lower-value ‘homogenous’ goods – such as peripheral Europe - will face a significant loss in bilateral competitiveness.
We think China will face stronger growth headwinds in the coming months until Beijing ramps up more robust stimulus measures and allows yuan depreciation next spring. We believe growth will decelerate further in the next two quarters because: 1) the negative impact of the first two tranches of US tariffs on US$250bn Chinese products, introduced in Q3/18, is not yet fully reflected in the economic data, although the 12-month rolling sum of the trade surplus dropped 17% yoy in September mainly owing to stronger imports; 2) quarterly real retail sales in Q3/18 were the lowest since Q1/94, which suggests weaker consumption growth is not solely auto sales-related; and 3) headline real estate investment, stripping out land sales, grew -6.6% in September, and since there was massive housing sale front-loading in 2016-17, it is highly unlikely that in 2019 housing sales and investment growth will outperform 2018.
You can view a video HERE with Rory Green,Economist, China and South Korea, explaining why markets are wrong to expect typical China credit easing. Xi Jinping is not panicking and we expect stimulus measure to continue along existing modest lines. Domestic debt levels and the likelihood of a protracted China-US confrontation necessitate sustainable stimulus measures to support short and long term growth.
We have a 30 year track record of successful calls. Many of these calls combined economic, political and market analysis.READ MORE